Why the Label 'Female Founder' Should Be Celebrated, Not Shunned
Fortune8 hours ago
880

Why the Label 'Female Founder' Should Be Celebrated, Not Shunned

Entrepreneurship
femalefounders
womenentrepreneurship
leadership
businesssuccess
venturecapital
Share this content:

Summary:

  • Rejecting the term “female founder” is a growing movement among women in business.

  • Women-led companies perform 63% better than all-male founding teams.

  • Companies with a woman CEO have produced 226% better returns than the S&P 500.

  • Female leaders drive stronger engagement in the workplace.

  • Only 2% of venture capital funding goes to women-led companies despite their success.

The Rise of Women Entrepreneurs
There’s been a growing movement among women in business to reject the term “female founder.” The argument is that their work should stand on its own merit, free from what feels like a DEI qualifier. This backlash is similar to the response to “girl boss,” with women asserting: “I’m just a boss.”

Understanding the Resistance
The resistance to the term is understandable. Female entrepreneurs often have to fight for recognition, and the label “female founder” can imply tokenism rather than distinction. It suggests that being a woman is the defining characteristic of success, rather than the ability to innovate and lead.

Women-led Businesses Excel
However, the data tells a different story. Women-led companies perform 63% better than all-male founding teams according to First Round Capital. Additionally, companies with a woman CEO produced 226% better returns than the S&P 500. These statistics show that women-led teams generate 35% higher returns on investment than their male-led counterparts.

The Impact of Female Leadership
Beyond financials, female leaders drive stronger workplace engagement. A 2015 Gallup report indicated that female managers outperform male counterparts in engaging employees. Research from Harvard Business Review shows that women leaders score higher in nearly every leadership competency.

Reframing the Conversation
The term “female founder” should not be seen as a limitation but rather as an indicator of higher performance and exceptional leadership. Instead of distancing from the term, we should own it as a mark of excellence.

Challenges Persist
Despite their success, women-led companies still receive only 2% of venture capital funding. This disparity highlights the systemic barriers that exist in the business landscape.

Flipping the Script
Some female founders, like Sarah Blakely of Spanx, embrace their identity as a competitive advantage, proving that being underestimated can fuel success.

A Call to Redefine
What if “female founder” became synonymous with outperforming expectations and leading with excellence? There’s power in owning the term and the data that supports it. Being a female founder isn’t a limitation—it’s a superpower.

Comments

0
0/300
Newsletter

Subscribe our newsletter to receive our daily digested news

Join our newsletter and get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox.

ListMyStartup.app logo

ListMyStartup.app

Get ListMyStartup.app on your phone!