Summary:
Western banks are increasingly cutting off Ukrainian tech startups, citing compliance and risk concerns.
Mercury, a popular U.S.-based fintech firm for startups, abruptly closed accounts in Ukraine, citing U.S. sanctions on Russian-occupied territories.
This situation highlights the growing problem of “derisking,” where banks are reluctant to work with businesses in high-risk regions.
Banks are derisking due to compliance concerns, risk aversion, and limited resources.
The impact on Ukrainian startups includes limited access to funding, hindered business operations, and reputation damage.
Solutions include increased regulatory clarity, collaboration between banks and startups, and support from international organizations.
Despite these challenges, Ukrainian tech remains resilient, finding alternative banking solutions and adapting to the changing landscape.
Ukraine's Tech Startups: A Target of Western Bank Derisking?
The Ukrainian tech scene is booming, with startups attracting investment and talent. However, they face a growing challenge: Western banks are increasingly cutting them off, citing compliance and risk concerns.
Mercury, a U.S.-based fintech firm popular among Ukrainian startups, abruptly closed accounts in July 2024. The company blamed U.S. sanctions on Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine, but Ukrainian founders argue that Mercury is being overly cautious and unfairly punishing them for the war.
This situation highlights the growing problem of “derisking”, where banks are increasingly reluctant to work with businesses in perceived high-risk regions. This is particularly problematic for Ukraine, where the tech sector is a vital part of the economy.
Why are banks derisking?
- Compliance concerns: Banks face strict regulations to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. They are under increasing pressure to avoid any potential violations, even if it means cutting off legitimate businesses.
- Risk aversion: Banks are inherently risk-averse, and they may see Ukraine as a high-risk environment due to the ongoing war. They may also be concerned about the potential for fraud or financial instability.
- Limited resources: Banks may not have the resources or expertise to adequately assess the risk associated with Ukrainian businesses.
The impact on Ukrainian startups:
- Access to funding: Without access to bank accounts, startups are unable to receive funding or make payments, hindering their growth and development.
- Business operations: Startups need bank accounts to manage their finances, pay employees, and conduct business transactions.
- Reputation damage: The sudden closure of accounts can damage the reputation of Ukrainian startups and make it harder for them to secure future investment.
What can be done?
- Increased regulatory clarity: Governments need to provide clear guidelines on how to address derisking and ensure that legitimate businesses are not unfairly penalized.
- Collaboration between banks and startups: Banks and startups need to work together to develop solutions that mitigate risks while facilitating access to financial services.
- Support from international organizations: International organizations can provide financial and technical assistance to help Ukrainian startups navigate these challenges.
The future of Ukrainian tech:
Despite these challenges, the Ukrainian tech sector remains resilient. Startups are finding alternative banking solutions and are adapting to the changing regulatory landscape. However, the derisking trend poses a serious threat to the growth of the Ukrainian tech scene and requires a coordinated effort from governments, banks, and the international community to address.
Comments